logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.05.31 2017고단4770
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(공중밀집장소에서의추행)
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be set forth in six months.

However, the sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 08:00 on June 20, 2017, the Defendant, at the entrance station of subway 4, the subway line 102, located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, toward the station of the Eastern History and Culture Park, followed by the victim (n, 30 vehicles) whose name cannot be known, and the Defendant’s her her her mare her part of the Defendant’s sexual flag was her her part above.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim at a place where public transportation is concentrated.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. The defendant asserts that the body of the defendant was not in contact with the intent of committing an indecent act against the victim, such as the color photographs and video CDs (the defendant and his defense counsel).

No statement is made to a victim because an investigation agency does not investigate the victim into the victim.

However, the witness C, who is a police officer in charge of witness witness and investigation, is present in this court and confirms that he was the person at the time through the appearance of the defendant, and then specifically states the circumstances where he was the defendant for a considerable period of time, the attitude that the defendant was taken after the victim, and the reason why the victim avoided the preparation of the statement statement.

In light of the police officer's experience and attitude of the statement in this court as a police officer in charge of a large number of cases for a considerable period of time, the statement's credibility is recognized, and it cannot be said that the credibility of the statement is denied merely because it does not complete memory at the time in some detailed parts.

여기에 동영상 CD에서 확인할 수 있는 피고인이 팔짱을 끼고 하체 부분을 부자연스럽게 앞으로 내밀고 있는 모습과 피고인이 피해자의 뒤쪽에 바짝 붙지 않으면 안 될 정도로 피고인 뒷부분의 공간이 부족하지는 않았던 사정 등까지 모두 종합하면, 피고인이 피해자를 공중 밀집장소에서...

arrow