A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a self-employed person running D, etc.

The defendant knew that the victim E who was placed in front of the voluntary retirement wanted to acquire the F Burial, and introduced the store acquisition, and attempted to collect the difference by planting the deposit of the store.

1. Fraud;

A. On April 2015, the Defendant called the victim at a place where a police officer was not a police officer, and called “G building 103 (F) is 150 million won with premium, which is 150 million won and very low price, and it is particularly granted to the width that he/she made up of the premium near one year for himself/herself.

In addition, if a competitor becomes a competitor in the G building 102, the damage is enormous, and the acquisition of premium is 20 million won. 102

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the premium in the above G building 103 is 70 million won and there was no premium in the G building 102.

On April 6, 2015, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and he received 40 million won from the above victim as the passbook in the name of the defendant around April 6, 2015, 170 million won from the same passbook around the 103th day of the same month, and received 70 million won as the premium of G building 103, 30 million won as the deposit money, and 10 million won as the deposit money of G building 102, and acquired the remaining 10 million won.

B. On April 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim, stating that “F should have personnel management to the employees who were able to have been given a intermittent value.”

However, the facts did not have the intention or ability to make the building owner futures.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and was transferred to the head of the Tong in the name of the defendant on April 30, 2015, two million won in the name of the building owner gift, five million won in the name of the person responsible for developing the F head office, one million won in the name of the person responsible for the development of the F head office, and one million won in the name of the head office of the building management gift.

2. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. The defendant is the above.