beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On June 16, 2011, the Defendant filed an application against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) for a disposition of perusal and copying of accounting books under this Court 201Kahap26, and on June 16, 201, this Court rendered a provisional disposition that “The Plaintiff Company shall allow the Defendant to peruse and copy (including photographing and copying of computer storage devices) the books and documents in the separate sheet from 425-3, the head office of the Plaintiff Company, from 425-3 to 18:00, the business hours during the ten-day period from the day following the day of service of this decision (hereinafter “the provisional disposition order of this case”), and the original copy was served on the Plaintiff Company at that time.
B. Even after the delivery of the original copy of the decision on provisional disposition of this case, the Plaintiff Company failed to perform its duty to peruse and copy the account books and documents in accordance with the decision on provisional disposition of this case, the Defendant filed an application with the Plaintiff Company for indirect compulsory enforcement with this court B. On July 21, 2011, this court must allow the Plaintiff Company to peruse and copy (including photographs and copies of computer storage devices) the account books and documents in the separate sheet in 425-3, the main office of the Plaintiff Company, only for ten (10) days from the day following the date of service of this decision, excluding holidays.
Plaintiff
If a company fails to perform its obligation within the above period, it shall pay to the defendant the amount calculated by the ratio of KRW 5 million per day from the day after the above period expires until the completion of its performance. "The decision of indirect compulsory performance of this case" was "the decision of indirect compulsory performance of this case". The original copy of the decision was served on the plaintiff company on July 22, 201.
C. The accounting company C, which was delegated by the Defendant, inspected and inspected some of the accounting books and documents of the Plaintiff Company from July 22, 2011 to August 3, 2011.
The defendant shall execute an execution clause against the decision of indirect compulsory performance in this case to the court.