Text
1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;
2. Attached Form 92 through 108 owned by the Defendant on November 22, 2007.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. During the period from September 6, 1910 to June 15, 1921, the Plaintiff’s assistance unit B (C birth to August 1957, 195) acquired each of the above real estate (hereinafter “each of the instant land”) after being transferred from each State to March 3, 1932, each of the instant land was inherited to the Plaintiff after the Plaintiff’s death.
(However, with respect to each land of this case from May 8, 1972 to October 30, 197, the registration of preservation of ownership was made in the name of the plaintiff as to the land of this case 10, 38, and 100 to 103, among each land of this case, and the registration of preservation of ownership was made in the name of the plaintiff between January 15, 1962 to February 17, 198.
On December 8, 2006 and January 12, 2007, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that each of the instant lands was acquired by B, who is the pro-Japanese and anti-national actors, and constitutes pro-Japanese and constitutes pro-Japanese and thus, constitutes “B” under Article 2 subparag. 1 (a) of the Special Act on Finding the Truth of Anti-National Acts under Article 19(1) of the same Act (hereinafter “Special Act”) and subject to investigation after the decision to commence an investigation on each of the instant lands under Article 19(1); (b) on November 22, 2007, “B” under Article 92 through 108 of the Special Act on Finding the Truth of Anti-National Acts under the Japanese colonial Rule (hereinafter “The Fact-Finding Act”); and (c) on September 6, 1910, each of the instant lands constitutes pro-Japanese and anti-national actors under Article 2 subparag. 1 (a) of the Special Act; and (d) on March 23, 19, 2000.