logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원(전주) 2020.02.06 2018나11843
약정금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the plaintiff's new argument that is newly made by this court in 2.

(원고의 항소 이유는 제1심에서의 주장과 다르지 않다. 제1심 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하면 제1심의 사실인정과 판단은 정당하다). ◎ 제1심 판결 2쪽 1의 나.

The phrase “Defendant B” and the phrase “Defendant B” and the phrase “based grounds for recognition” in paragraphs (f) and (f) are deleted, respectively, the phrase “as indicated in the evidence Nos. 4 and 8, and as a result of the reply to the order of submission of tax information on the military acid of this Court.”

◎ 제1심 판결 6쪽 6~9행을 삭제하고, 같은 쪽 10행을 ‘원고가 제출한 증거만으로는 피고 회사가 이 사건’으로 고친다.

In addition, it is difficult to conclude that the Defendant Company carried out soil and rocks, etc. equivalent to the quantity claimed by the Plaintiff from the land of this case, on the ground that there is no "I do not exist" during the same eighteen.

◎ 제1심 판결 7쪽 9~10행 중 ‘이 법원의 군산세무서에 대한 과세정보제출명령 회신결과에 의하면’부터 12행까지를 다음과 같이 고친다.

In full view of the results of the fact-finding inquiry about G and H in this Court (except the fact-finding inquiry inquiry conducted on January 22, 2020 by G Co., Ltd.) and the results of the court of first instance’s reply to the order to submit tax information on the duty of taxation in the military of the court of first instance as to the above company from 2009 to 2012, the sales amount by the Defendant Co., Ltd. are as listed below, and this does not significantly fall short of the sales amount of earth and stones, etc. claimed by the Plaintiff ( further, in light of the content of the reply to fact-finding inquiry made by G and H Co., Ltd. on November 27, 2019), the sales details between the Defendant Co., Ltd. and

arrow