1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court added the judgment as to the part asserted by the plaintiff during the trial and the part concerning the new argument by the court of first instance as to this case, is the same as the part corresponding to the defendants among the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

From No. 3 to No. 7 of the first instance judgment, the Plaintiff completed the registration of the representative director and the resignation of directors with respect to K on July 18, 2013, and the registration of the office of representative director with respect to F, respectively. Thereafter, on April 15, 2014, F resigned from office of the Plaintiff’s representative director and the director. On October 25, 2014, the Plaintiff held the board of directors on October 25, 2014, and held a resolution to dismiss F from the representative director and the director, dismiss Defendant B as the representative director and U as a new director, and made a resolution to appoint Defendant B as the representative director and U as a new director on October 28, 2014, with respect to F, the registration of the dismissal of the representative director and the director, and the registration of the office of representative director with respect to Defendant B as the representative director.

No. 4 of the first instance judgment, 7 of the first instance judgment, "51,840,00 won" was added to "581,850,000 won".

On November 18, 2014, 200,000 won of the temporary amount of money used in the order to file a request for remedy against the plaintiff, such as unfair dismissal, which was filed by Q Q, who was an employee of the plaintiff, on February 33, 2015, against the plaintiff, for the costs of the labor company in the case of the request for remedy, such as unfair dismissal, filed by the plaintiff against the plaintiff on February 11, 2015, the costs of the labor company in the case of the request for remedy, such as unfair dismissal, filed by the plaintiff on February 25, 2015, which was filed by the plaintiff on February 27, 32015 against the plaintiff, the costs of the labor company in the case of the request for remedy, such as unfair dismissal, etc., raised by the plaintiff on November 5, 2014 (Seoul High Court Decision 2014Na17253). 2030,0033, Nov. 11, 2014, 2014