beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff is a certified public appraiser affiliated with B certified public appraisers of B certified public appraisal corporations (hereinafter “instant appraisal corporation”); from November 23, 201 to November 25, 201, the Plaintiff conducted an appraisal for the purpose of security (hereinafter “instant appraisal”) with respect to the value of KRW 1,653 square meters in Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do; KRW 1,780 square meters in D forest land; KRW 1,783 square meters in E forest land; KRW 1,415 square meters in 1,653 square meters in E forest land; and KRW 1,452 square meters in F forest land (hereinafter “instant land”), among KRW 1,653 square meters in forest land; and KRW 1,453 square meters in forest land (hereinafter “instant appraisal”).
B. In conducting the instant appraisal, the Plaintiff selected G forest land 28,364 square meters (hereinafter “the instant comparative standard site”) as a comparative standard site, and calculated individual factors as shown below [Attachment 1], and calculated the unit price of the instant land as indicated below [Attachment 2] as 2.20, the Plaintiff calculated the correction value of other factors taking into account the appraisal precedents indicated below [Attachment 2] (hereinafter “instant appraisal precedents”), and calculated the unit price of the instant land as indicated below [Attachment 3].
As a result, the sum of the appraised values of the instant land became approximately KRW 1.2 billion.
[Attachment 1] The individual factors compared to the individual factors are 2.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 15.00 1.00 / [Attachment 2] 3,932 m2 / 180,000 / 200 3,932 180 m2,000 / 200 3 J 2, 495 m210,000 / 723 00,005 200 m20,000 m200 m20,000 m20 m200 m20,000 m270 m270,000 m273 / 1,283 m270,000 / 1,300 m270 m239.
C. On December 9, 2014, the Defendant issued a disposition of 8 months of business suspension (from January 1, 2015 to August 31, 2015) to the Plaintiff on the ground that the Defendant erroneously conducted an appraisal as shown in attached Table 1.
(hereinafter “instant disposition”). [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, A’s evidence No. 1.