Text
1. The plaintiff's rehabilitation obligor C, the lawsuit taking over the defendant Kyungnam Company Co., Ltd.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Status 1 of the parties concerned) The plaintiff is a A apartment located on the ground D of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu (hereinafter "the apartment of this case").
For the management of the apartment complex, an autonomous management organization consisting of occupants pursuant to the Housing Act and the Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act. 2) An Gyeongnam Leisure Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Gyeongnam Industry”) is a project proprietor who constructed and sold the apartment complex of this case, and the Gyeongnam Enterprise Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Gyeongnam Enterprise”) is a project proprietor who completed the construction of the new apartment of this case by being awarded a contract for the construction
(B) As seen in the rear, each custodian took over the lawsuit of this case after the commencement of rehabilitation procedures for the leisure industry and the company in South and North Korea.
1) The Defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation shall develop the instant apartment site E and one of the F Housing Sites (hereinafter referred to as the “instant housing site”) in order to conclude the construction and warranty contract of the instant apartment complex.
(2) On May 29, 2009, the Gyeongnam Enterprise sold the apartment of this case, which is composed of seven buildings, 368 households, and 48,335.04 square meters in total, with the approval of the housing construction project plan on November 17, 2006, and sold the apartment of this case to the occupants of the apartment of this case. (2) On May 29, 2009, the Gyeongnam Enterprise changed its name into the current name pursuant to Article 4 of the Addenda to the Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation Act (Act No. 12989) of the Housing and Urban Fund Act (No. 1, 2015) and the guarantee creditor as the market as shown below, concluded each contract for the repair of the apartment of this case (hereinafter “each of this case”) and deposited the guarantee insurance policy with the Mayor under the guarantee contract issued by the Defendant Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation (hereinafter “each of this case”).
The security deposit for the guarantee period from June 30, 2009 to June 29, 2010 shall be 300,404,160 from June 30, 2009 to June 29, 2011 to June 29, 201.