logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2012.03.30 2011고합171
배임수재등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of 10 months, Defendant B's imprisonment with prison labor of 8 months, and Defendant C's imprisonment with prison labor.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] Defendant B was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on March 18, 2010 and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 26, 2010. On June 8, 2010, the above judgment was finalized on December 27, 2010. On November 22, 2011, the Suwon District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on November 30, 201. Defendant C was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution to eight months of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) at the Incheon District Court on February 16, 2009.

[2011Gohap171] Defendant A is the head of the management office of the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City N apartment (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”) who is delegated with the authority to select the person operating the nursery facilities by the head of the association of the association of the above apartment reconstruction association (public official pursuant to Article 84 of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents), Defendant B is the specialized broker of the right to operate the nursery facilities in the apartment complex, Defendant C is the operator of the service company of the above apartment complex, Defendant D is the person operating the apartment against the above residents.

Defendant

B around January 209, it received a request from Q operating (main) P in the above apartment site from Q to allow the operation of childcare facilities in the apartment complex of this case, and offered money to Defendant D and Defendant E for the purpose of soliciting that Q would be selected as the operator of childcare facilities.

1. Property in breach of trust by Defendant A;

A. On January 22, 2009, the Defendant received illegal solicitation to allow Q Q to operate a nursery facility within the apartment of the instant apartment on the part of the Defendant, under the name of R, the Defendant’s seat.

arrow