The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the Defendant recognized and reflected the instant crime.

However, the defendant has been subject to punishment for the same crime, and in particular, he committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime for the same crime.

In addition, the lower court’s sentencing is determined to be appropriate, and it does not seem unfair because it is too unreasonable, in light of the following circumstances, comprehensively takes account of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the previous theory.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.