logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2019.07.04 2019고단1002
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 23:00 on April 19, 2019, the Defendant driven a DNA car at the 4km section from the front of an Asan City “C” restaurant located in Asan City B with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.131%, to the shooting distance prior to the pest control of approximately 1975, as Isan City hot spring.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from D Driving) is a person engaged in driving a DRason car.

On April 19, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car with a blood alcohol level of 0.131% 0.1% around 23:00 and proceeded at a speed of about 40 to 50 km in the direction of the south intersection, along the three-lanes in the direction of the south intersection, along the road near the shooting distance in front of the distribution prevention of damage in 1975, as Isan City hot spring.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of alcohol, and has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving a motor vehicle safely, such as accurately manipulating the steering gear, brake system, etc. by taking into account the traffic situation.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, found that the F SP car driven ahead of the same direction by the victim E (n,e.g., the age of 54) driven by the victim E (n, the age of 54) had been driven in the same direction, and immediately operated the car after the signal signal, but the Defendant did not avoid it, and the part of the victim's sP motor vehicle driven by the victim was shocked by the front driver of the above LP car.

As above, the Defendant was negligent in driving a motor vehicle while driving the motor vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult, and the Defendant did not have two or more open locations where two weeks of treatment is required for injury to the victim E, such as salt chills, tensions, etc., and the victim G (V, 78 years of age) who is the passenger of the damaged vehicle.

arrow