1. Defendant D’s KRW 10,000,000 within the scope of the property inherited from the network E and its related thereto on March 2, 2013.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. In accordance with Article 45 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the Plaintiff: (a) was designated by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport as a truster to the business of guaranteeing automobile accident compensation; and (b) entered into an automobile insurance contract covering injuries caused by G vehicles with F (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

H is F’s child.

B. Defendant A is the owner of IA car, and Defendant M&A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant M&A”) entered into an automobile insurance contract with Defendant A with respect to the said vehicle.

C. On May 24, 2012, E, Defendant B, and H stolen the I car parked at the front parking lot of Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul J.

E, without a driver's license, is driving as Defendant B at the lower seat of the I car with Defendant B on May 26, 2012. On May 26, 2012, in the absence of a driver's license, due to an accident of shocking a dump truck drivening the two-lane between the two-lanes of the opposite direction while driving in front of the K building in Busan East-gu, Busan, along the center line with the sea guard from the intersection of the intersection.

Due to the above accident, E died, and H suffered injury, such as brain ties, external cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral typosis, two thale, external typosis, external typosis, the balposis of the right-end ladr, and the balphere of the right-end ladrosis, and the defendant B suffered significant injury.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

(1) As a guarantee business operator under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the Plaintiff paid a total of KRW 20 million, which is the limit of the first degree of injury to H treatment hospitals or H from July 19, 2012 to August 14, 2012.

The above amount is paid within the scope of the reasonable right to claim damages against the deceased of H.

(2) In addition, the Plaintiff, as an insurer of a non-life-free motor vehicle special agreement, treated the insured H directly or indirectly as prescribed by the terms and conditions.