logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.06.18 2019구단58097
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. During the process of the disposition, the Plaintiff’s short-term visit for refugee status (C-3, 12 days) on October 15, 2016 of the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (C-3, 12 days) (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the date of application for refugee status recognition: (a) February 23, 2018 of the date of application for refugee status recognition as of October 25, 2016; (b) there is no dispute over the grounds for rejection of the decision made on April 11, 2018; (c) there is no ground for rejection of the decision made on April 29, 2018; (d) evidence Nos. 1 through 4; and (e) evidence Nos. 1 and 2; and (e) the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Ethiopia Government of Ethiopia, a small number of ethnic minoritiess, e.g., Ethiopia, was imminent. The Plaintiff’s resistance at the time of departure from the Republic of Korea, around October 9, 2016, which was around October 9, 2016, led to the ethropia’s resistance and the lepia’s national emergency declaration.

Ethiopia government enforced the regional expansion policy around 2010, and forced to cut the land owned by the plaintiff's leader without proper compensation, and the plaintiff arrested the plaintiff and detained the plaintiff for several months.

In addition, at the time of Ethiopia’s total election in 2015, the Plaintiff was engaged in activities to support the Plaintiff. The Ethiopia Government arrested and confined the Plaintiff with a cover of the title of members B(B) and B, and engaged in physical abuse.

For this reason, the Plaintiff left Ethiopia and applied for refugee status. The instant disposition that did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee is unlawful.

B. (1) In full view of the provisions of Article 2 Subparag. 1 and Article 18 of the Refugee Act, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees, the Minister of Justice shall be entitled to the protection of the country of nationality due to well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political comments.

arrow