1 The plaintiffs' appeals are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable even if the evidence adopted in the court of first instance added the additional evidence

Therefore, this court's reasoning is as follows, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as follows.

2. Article 1-2 (b) of the judgment of the first instance:

The second part of paragraph 2 is the "3,240/25,710 shares among 12,85 square meters in forest land" as the "3,240/12,855 shares in forest land".

ARTICLE 3-A

The fourth part of the plaintiff's exercise of "the plaintiff's exercise" is considered to be "the plaintiff's exercise of rights."

ARTICLE 3-2

Section 3 is to add “B 23” to “B 1 to 19”.

ARTICLE 3-2

Paragraph 10th "53,000" shall be read as "59,000".

The fifth 4-6th string is as follows.

In order to obtain property benefits of KRW 590 million equivalent to the amount, and to inflict property damages equivalent to the same amount on K, but to have attempted to do so.

It was prosecuted as an attempted occupational breach of trust due to the criminal facts, and sentenced to conviction.

A person shall be appointed.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.