logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2014.11.26 2013가합1327
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 7, 8, 12, 13, 16, 17, 20 through 25 (including the pertinent branches number), witness C, D, and E's testimony, and there is no counter-proof.

On June 20, 1989, the Plaintiff drafted a real estate sales contract with D with the following contents:

(hereinafter referred to as “the contract 1st: The seller: D and the buyer: 28,165 square meters of F forest, G forest, 8,727 square meters in terms of the Plaintiff’s real estate, and H 7,402 square meters prior to I; 843 square meters prior to J; 823 square meters in terms of M 264 square meters, M 106 square meters, N 3,911 square meters, P 202 square meters in terms of Q 2,453 square meters, Q 2,453 square meters in terms of the Plaintiff’s real estate, and H 8,402 square meters in terms of the contract 264 square meters, M 106 square meters in terms of the contract 106 square meters, N 3,911 square meters, P 202 square meters in terms of Q 2,453 square meters, and Q 1,696 square meters in terms of the remaining payment period (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant land”).

1. By August 30, 1990 in cases of graveyardss;

2. The annual trends are to be harvested by a prop (D);

B. The Plaintiff paid the down payment of KRW 10 million and the intermediate payment of KRW 30 million to D on the day of the contract.

C. Of the instant land, not only the land owned by D’s sole name but also the land owned by U, children V, W, X, and Y, the heir of the Defendant, E (former S prior to the name of each name), and the network T. D.

The defendant is sentenced to D's punishment, and E and T are relatives of D.

E. When the prior procedures such as inheritance registration for the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the instant land were delayed, the Plaintiff drafted a sales contract with D as follows in order to complete the provisional registration of the right to claim ownership transfer with respect to the instant land by representing the remaining owners of the instant land:

(hereinafter referred to as “second contract”). The date of the contract: D, the Defendant, E, V, U, X, W, June 20, 1989.

arrow