The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below shows that the defendant committed the crime of this case under favorable circumstances such as the confession of the crime of this case and the fact that he did not have the record of criminal punishment for narcotics crimes since 2002. However, the crime of this case is necessary to be strictly punished and eradicated in light of the addiction to narcotics and the harm caused by administration of narcotics, etc. because the defendant purchased phiphonephones from another narcotics offender and administered phiphones twice, etc. The defendant committed the crime of this case even though he had the record of punishment already been punished two times for the same crime (one time, one time, and one time, one time, one time, one time, one time, one time, one time, one time, one time, etc.): the defendant's oral appraisal results from "training" (one hundred to 14cc, one day, two months, one day, one day, one day, one day, and six years, one year, one year, two, and six, one year, one year, two, and six, one year, one, and six, one year, one, two, one, two, two, one, two, two, more years, and more.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.