logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.09.11 2020고단3660
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

An application filed by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around July 2019, the criminal defendant committed fraud against C with the victim C, who was a part-time trainee of the “D” game camera run by the criminal defendant with hiding his/her marriage.

On September 2, 2019, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C in his/her own house in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the effect that “It is necessary to put put to place place orders and store indoor sports halls in Eunpyeong-gu, and pay money immediately.”

However, in fact, the defendant was thought to use the money received from the victim as gambling and living expenses, and the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the money to the victim normally because he was unable to repay the money with bonds.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim C, received KRW 150,000 from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (F) in the name of the Co., Ltd. on the same day.

In addition, from around that time to January 16, 2020, the Defendant acquired 56,320,000 won in total from the victim C over 28 times, as shown in the attached list 1 of crimes committed.

2. Around May 2020, the criminal defendant, against the victim B, committed fraud with the victim B, who was aware of his/her her her her her her her her her her her marriage with “Ma-gu Man-nam.”

On May 10, 2020, the Defendant made a false call to the victim B located in his/her own house in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and made a false statement to the effect that “A sports ground rent under a contract is not possible on the wind to pay the agreed amount because all the students are injured during sports classes, and that the Defendant would have repaid the money immediately because he/she borrowed the money because he/she would receive the fund termination money.”

However, the Defendant was thought to use the money received from the victim as gambling and living expenses, and there was no fund scheduled to terminate, and the personal passbook was seized because it was impossible to repay the money with bonds.

arrow