beta
Text
The judgment below
Of them, the part on Defendant B shall be reversed.
Defendant
B A person shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that this judgment.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Defendant A1) In fact, Defendant A1 was aware that the victim’s face face was 2 to 3 times, but did not inflict an injury on the victim due to the need for medical treatment for 14 days, which was due to the victim’s king evidence.
Nevertheless, the lower court which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2) The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (three months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.
B. Defendant B’s sentence (six months of imprisonment) imposed on the Defendant is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. As to the Defendant A’s assertion of misunderstanding of facts, the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court and the first instance court’s duly adopted and investigated by the court, namely, ① the name of the Defendant C in the diagnosis issued by the victim “Ahhhhhhhh,” and the part and degree of the injury (“Ahhhhhhhh,” the degree of the injury was indicated as follows: “Ahhh, at the right side of the lower court and the left side of the lower court showed a positive reaction, and there is a minor bruction.” This is the purport that there was a symptoms that only 2 the lower two of the two of the two of the two of the two of the two of the above, and the above diagnosis was indicated in the above diagnosis as follows: “The name of the Defendant Chhh, at the right side of the lower court and the first Daegu, became a part of the injury, but it was impossible to confirm if there was a serious shock.”
The following is the purport that only one of the flags was laid down due to the instant case, but the victim does not include the flag of the fia", which is the name of the sick person diagnosed as the injury, and ② the victim was extracted from the investigative agency by the victim with the flag of the flag and the right flag of the flag.
However, it was not bruised because it was no longer bruised.
“At the trial court,” three of the three of the above statements were stated as “Before they were assaulted by the Defendant.”