logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.03.11 2015나16085
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "The plaintiff made and submitted two wood farmings in accordance with the development agreement of this case" part of the first instance court's reasoning (No. 4.7) and "the plaintiff made and submitted two wood farmings in accordance with the development agreement of this case, and submitted development data at the defendant's request," and the third part (No. 6.8) of the third part (No. 8) submitted at the trial of this case are rejected due to lack of recognition of the defendant's assertion, and the result of verification by the court of the first instance in the third part (the number includes each number) and the third part (No. 16. 24) are as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding the following contents to the third part (3) (3) (5th part (8.5 second part) as stated in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, and thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional part (In addition, even if the development contract of this case is deemed terminated, if one of the parties terminates the contract, the contract shall lose its effect for the future (Article 550 of the Civil Act).

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow