beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claim selected by this court are all dismissed.
2. Appeal costs and interest.
Reasons
The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited this part of the judgment, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following modifications and additions, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the
The part of the first instance court’s 4th 9th 9th sing to revise the part of the first instance judgment stating that “the test report was unnecessary for approval for use, and both the Plaintiff and the Defendant appears to have entered into the instant sales contract without knowing the necessity of the test report through the amendment of relevant statutes. However, at the time of the conclusion of the instant sales contract, the Plaintiff and the Defendant revised the part to the effect that “the Plaintiff entered into the instant sales contract without knowing that it is difficult to issue the test report due to changes in the standard due to the amendment of relevant laws and regulations.”
The plaintiff's assertion about the claim for damages arising from the liability for negligence in the conclusion of the contract that added the part of the contract is not possible to issue the test report of the mobile house of this case, and the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the plaintiff's belief that the contract of this case was valid. The defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the plaintiff's belief that the contract of this case was valid.
Judgment
If the purport of the argument is added to the result of the statement No. 1, the testimony of the witness D of the first instance trial, and the fact-finding conducted by the court of first instance as to C, the instant mobile house was manufactured in or around May 2015 and purchased from C in or around May 2015. The Defendant purchased the instant mobile house from C and kept it in custody without obtaining approval for its use. The Defendant sold it to the Plaintiff as it was. The instant mobile house is among the instant mobile-type housing even when it is delivered to the Plaintiff, even when it is delivered to the Plaintiff.