A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for five years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a married couple who is currently living together with the victim C in around 1992.

On October 6, 2013, the Defendant thought that the victim, who was her wife at the inside of the second floor of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, was about to disregarding the Defendant himself/herself who is not healthy after undergoing clifying and clifying operations, while she was shot at the time when the victim was her fying factory and late her home, and she was shotly ill, and then she was in the front clifing her body, and then she was in the front clifing engine (23 cm in total length, 12.5 cm in blade, 2 cm in knife in knife). While she was fying the victim's chest, the Defendant tried to kill the victim's children at the right right by her kniffy, and tried to kill the victim's children at the right right by her kniff.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. Statement made to F and C by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (limited to criminal behavior tools and field photographs, attachment of accompanying photographs, investigation of the other party of the victim, the standing and condition of the victim, the injury diagnosis report of the victim), and medical certificates;

1. Relevant Articles 254 and 250 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (the point of attempted murder and the choice of limited imprisonment);

1. Article 25 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of attempted crimes;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant was in a state of mental disability under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of this case. However, according to each evidence duly adopted by the court and completed the investigation, the defendant's drinking at the time of the crime of this case.