logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.01.31 2017고단2358
응급의료에관한법률위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The court recognizes the facts charged to the extent that it recognizes the identity of the facts charged in accordance with the contents of the evidence duly adopted and investigated, and does not actually disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense.

No person shall interfere with the rescue, transfer, emergency treatment, or medical treatment of an emergency patient by persons engaged in emergency medical services by means of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, threat, or other means, or destroy, damage, or occupy medical facilities, equipment, medicines, or other instruments for emergency medical services provided by a medical institution, etc.

Nevertheless, around July 6, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported that his mother, was not properly disinfected in an emergency room at a school in Seogu-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and that he was in charge of nursing in an emergency room at a staff room in the staff room, and (b) provided “the name of the nurse in charge of disinfection of his mother, who is 28 years old” to the victim F (F) who was in charge of nursing at the emergency room; (c) however, the Defendant was unable to immediately respond from the victim; and (d) when the victim’s knives were knibed one time.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the victim's treatment of emergency patients, who are employees of emergency medical services.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G and H;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A medical certificate of injury [the defendant was tightly shouldered while promoting the victim, but did not boom the victim, and at the time, the victim was not in the emergency medical service due to reporting the monitor.

The argument is asserted.

A. First, as to the Defendant’s assault, it is consistent from the Defendant to the point of view that the victim reported 112 to the point of view.

A police officer G who has made a statement, or dispatched pursuant to the 112 report, shall be deemed to have been blicked by the injured party.

At the time, the victim's left side was red, and the defendant was sealed with the victim's shoulder.

there is no phrase.

arrow