logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.11.23 2017고정581
주거침입등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the husband and wife of C, and the victim D (the age of 53) was a person who established the above C inhumanity relationship from September 2013.

1. On October 4, 2016, around 06:50, the Defendant infringed upon the residence of the victim by finding out the apartment E apartment of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the house of the victim located in 201 Dong 801 Dong 801, with the knowledge that the victim was her husband and her husband, leaving the door door door door to the victim, and leaving the door door door to the victim, and leaving the door door to the victim “after her attendance,” while leaving the door door and leaving the door door to “after her attendance,” the Defendant invadedd the victim’s residence until her door door.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, has “Neine” at the place where the victim’s children and three neighbors are located.

Worma said that it was "Iatn without permission about Chewing joints."

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

3. No one shall damage any other person's information processed, stored, or transmitted through an information and communications network, or infringe, misappropriate, or divulge any other person's confidential information.

Nevertheless, on September 18, 2016, the Defendant released the Plaintiff’s smartphone Nos. 1412 Dong 1203 from her husband’s her husband’s smartphone Nos. 1203, and taken the Defendant’s mobile phone pictures, such as the text message sent by her husband and the victim, and the photograph taken by her two persons, taken by her husband as the Defendant’s mobile phone. On October 18, 2016, the Defendant sent the Defendant’s mobile phone text messages and photographs to her husband G.

Accordingly, the defendant infringed another's secret stored in the information and communication network and leaked it.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the third public trial date);

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. The chief executive officer and the police officer;

arrow