logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.09.28 2017가합23152
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On November 14, 2015, the Plaintiff was driving on the non-party B’s frighting vehicle and was driving on the non-party B’s frighting vehicle in the agricultural and fishery market located in 95 at the Guriri-si. On November 14, 2015, there was a traffic accident that conflicts with the non-party D’s frighting vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

On July 17, 2016, the Guri Police Station received each motion picture from B and D at the time of the instant accident (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant images”), and verified whether D operates the motion picture submitted to the National Institute of Scientific Investigation and Investigation, and whether each of the instant images is mutually identical.

As a result of the appraisal sent on August 16, 2016, the determination as to whether to operate the files and videos “1.D Original Images,” which were requested by the requesting authority, cannot be made on the ground that the files are not presented together, and the determination as to whether to alter them cannot be made on the ground of the structural analysis of the relevant files. It shall be conducted only through the structural analysis of the files, and the identity between the original image and the images (b) submitted, and the speed at the time of the accident of the vehicles installed with black boxes is expected to be subsequent to a reply. As a result of the appraisal sent on August 17, 2016, the average speed of 2 vehicles at the base main line [Attachment 1] among the appraisal materials, the average speed of 1.6 vehicles at the base line [Attachment 1]. 2. Do-B 21 to 23. 93 through 19. Do-16. 21 to 28. 3. 28, 2016 were identical to the appraisal report of the film made on the film of the film. 1. 2. 2. 2. 3. 2 of the film. 3.

The plaintiff requested the Guri Police Station to change the content of the damage from the "no damage" to the "injury" among the contents of the statement in the Guri Police Station, and the identity of the video operation submitted by D and the identity of each video of this case.

arrow