1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 88,715,68 for each of the Plaintiffs as well as their respective 88,715,68 for each of them. From June 11, 2016 to October 12, 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 11, 2016, 18:57, the network H (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) driven an Iamba, and driven an Iamba, which is located in the area of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of

(hereinafter “instant traffic accident”). (b)

The Plaintiffs’ parents, Defendant C, and Defendant D were minors while driving a sea-going vehicle immediately before the instant traffic accident, and had Defendant E, who did not have a driver’s license, drive a sea-going vehicle at the time of the instant traffic accident, and Defendant E and Defendant F and G are parents of Defendant E.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements and images (including branch numbers where there are branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) of Gap's evidence 1 through 5, the fact inquiry results on the Busan Busan subordinate Police Station of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above recognition of liability and the above evidence, the traffic accident in this case occurred due to the mistake that Defendant E illegally loaded the sea-going vehicle in the section where the U-turn is prohibited. Thus, Defendant C is the owner of a sea-going vehicle. Defendant D used the sea-going vehicle to Defendant E who is a minor without a driver’s license, and ordered an illegal internship. Defendant E is the driver of the sea-going vehicle. Defendant F and G are the parents of Defendant E who are minor, and due to the traffic accident in this case, the deceased and the deceased jointly.