1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where each corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited or added as follows. Thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

At the bottom of Part 3, the following "SP" shall be added to the third place:

【Plaintiff, dissatisfied with the Plaintiff, filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of a disposition revoking the authorization to establish an establishment with the Busan District Court 2013Guhap4430 on December 16, 2013, but the claim was dismissed on November 28, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 17, 2014. From the 7th part of the 7th part of the 4th part, the part “i.e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e.,

【Inasmuch as it is not easy to convene and resolve a general meeting where members will pay contributions, etc. to the Plaintiff Union, the Defendants cannot be held equally liable for the obligations that the Plaintiff Union owes, without a resolution of a general meeting of partners (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Na84375, Jan. 17, 2013; Supreme Court Decision 2013Da27268, Jul. 25, 2013). (4) The articles of association of the Plaintiff Union merely regulates internal relations between the Plaintiff Union and its members, and it cannot be deemed that the Plaintiff Union bears specific obligations against the Plaintiff Union by the articles of association (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2014Da65748, Jan. 15, 2015; Supreme Court Decision 2014Na5649, Aug. 28, 2014).