The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below against the defendant on the summary of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The court below sentenced the defendant to the above punishment with regard to the reasons for appeal, as stated in its reasoning, and it is reasonable to respect the sentencing of the court below in this case where there is no change in circumstances that can be newly considered in the trial of the court.

In addition, according to the records of this case, the defendant started to commit each of the crimes of this case 10 days after release, and the defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with C’s business affairs on July 7, 2018. The defendant was found to have committed other crimes without attending the police station on July 9, 2018 because it was difficult to conduct an investigation at the time, and without attending the police station on the same day after the release on the same day.

In addition, even if examining various sentencing conditions specified in the argument of this case, such as the character and conduct of the defendant, family environment, the result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below does not seem to be unfair and unfair.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.