The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as indicated in the facts charged in the instant case, did not have any fact when the head of the victim was fluorous due to a small-scale disease, and in carics in carics, the disease was broken, and only a small number of fluorous transfusions occurred in the head of the victim.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case that the defendant was found guilty on one occasion of the victim's left head due to the gathering of the victim's illness. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one year and two months of imprisonment, three years of suspended execution, and 200 hours of community service) is too unreasonable.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined at the court below: ① the victim made a statement that corresponds to the facts charged in the instant case to the purport that the defendant was forced to unsatisfing the patient's left side because the defendant was in the investigative agency, and that the defendant was forced to unsatisfing the patient's disease; ② if the defendant was faced with a satisfing disease, the saturf is also in the face of the saturf, and the saturf is likely to have been damaged. According to the on-site photograph (Evidence No. 31 of the Evidence Record), the saturf is scattered only on the floor, and there is no corrosion that was destroyed by the satisfing of the above saturfing, ③ the victim was diagnosed at the investigative agency at the time of the instant case to the extent that the satisfing victim's satisfing, and the victim was diagnosed to the extent that it was necessary after the satisfing.