logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.02.11 2020고단186
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 13 million.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On August 12, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million by the Seoul Southern District Court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

On December 17, 2019, at around 01:40, the Defendant driven C or a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of about 0.158% of alcohol concentration from the 1km section to the front road of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the statement of the status of a drinking driver, the report on the status of a drinking driver, and the written appraisal of alcohol;

1. Previouss before judgment: Criminal records, reply reports, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the ordinary case inquiry;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include: (a) the Defendant repeats the driving of drinking alcohol; (b) the fact that the Defendant is considerably high in both the drinking alcohol level and the previous drinking alcohol level is found to be disadvantageous to the Defendant; (c) the Defendant’s previous drinking alcohol level was exposed once more than ten years prior to the previous fine; and (d) there was no record of punishment heavier than the previous fine; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (d) the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of the instant case, such as the circumstances after the crime.

arrow