1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance regarding this case is to be stated in this case, and the court of first instance shall dismiss the “instant pledge contract” of the 4th judgment of the court of first instance as “written pledge contract” of the 4th judgment, and except for the judgment on the assertion added or emphasized by the plaintiff as follows, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of

2. A additionally placed master;

A. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant did not act as a broker for the apartment of this case, and did not visit the apartment of this case to confirm the condition of facilities, etc., and even if the legal relationship such as identification was not examined, the contract of this case and the confirmation and explanatory note of the object of brokerage were prepared, and thus, the defendant committed a tort aiding and abetting the fraud of this case by negligence.

B. (1) Article 2 subparag. 1 of the Licensed Real Estate Agent Act provides that "mediation" means mediation of sale, exchange, lease, and other gain, loss, and transfer of rights between the parties to a transaction regarding the object of brokerage. In light of the purport of the legal provision that aims to protect the parties to the transaction, the determination of which act constitutes brokerage shall not be made based on the subjective intent of the broker who has an intention to mediate or mediate the transaction for the party to the transaction, not on the basis of whether the broker has an intention to mediate or mediate the transaction for the party to the transaction, but on the basis of whether the broker's act objectively and objectively deemed as an

(2) In light of the facts and circumstances acknowledged earlier, the lessor and lessee agreed in advance on whether to enter into the instant lease contract and the terms and conditions of the contract, etc. However, even though they visited the office of the licensed real estate agent operated by the Defendant and agreed to the Defendant.