logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.06.20 2017나15370
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 19, 1989, the Plaintiff purchased a building of 230 square meters in Macheon-si, E (hereinafter “instant land”). On February 7, 2017, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the instant land and the instant building on January 20, 1989.

B. 1) On February 4, 1998, the land size of 3, 493 square meters in Seocheon-si is 866 square meters in Seocheon-si (hereinafter “instant land 2”) due to the merger of 155 square meters in Glue-si and 218 square meters in Hlue-si on February 4, 1998

(B) 137 square meters (hereinafter “the third land of this case”) in the relevant land.

A) The area was divided, and accordingly, 729 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “second-party land after the instant partition”).

(2) On October 4, 1989, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer based on the sale on September 30, 1989 with respect to the instant land No. 2.

C. The current status of the land No. 1, the land No. 2, and the land No. 3 after the partition is as shown in the annexed Form No. 2. At present, the part (A) part of the land No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1, among the land No. 2 after the division of this case, which is connected in the order of each point of the annexed Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 (hereinafter “the part of the land No. 80 square meters”) among the land No. 2 after the division of this case, and the part of the land No. 2 after the division of this case, which is the boundary of the remaining part of the land No. 1, i.e., the part of the annexed Form No. 1, and the part

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 7, Eul evidence 1 (including, if any, various numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The plaintiff alleged that he purchased the land No. 1 of this case and the building of this case on January 19, 1989, and the entire land No. 3 of this case and the part of the (A) of this case, or at least the land No. 1 of this case.

arrow