A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 7, 2016, the Defendant: “Around 00:10, the Defendant was divingd at the Haak-dong 2533 Blue-dong, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, 2533 Blue-do,” upon receiving a report from 112, and recommended the Defendant to have her home home, by breaking C, who was dispatched to the site, and the circumstances leading up to the Sungnam Police Station B, Sungnam-dong, Sungnam-dong, the Gyeongnam-dong, the Gyeongnam Police Station B, who was sent to the site; and

The Chewing Chewing theory was used as a "Chewing grans", and was used by hand to see the breath’s breath and cut off theme that is used in the breath’s breath, and to restrain it by using the breath’s breath with the breath’s breath as a hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the 112 reported duties and the maintenance of public order by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or C;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (which is against the law of the same kind without any previous conviction);

1. It is decided as ordered by the reason that protection and observation, community service and lecture attendance order are more than 62-2 of the Criminal Act (in order to prevent recidivism);