1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 7 through 12 (including paper numbers), and Eul evidence No. 1, the plaintiff's her son's son, around March 2016, sold the plaintiff's 78 miles to D without the plaintiff's permission for the payment of KRW 8,100,000,000,000 from D's purchase price, and C died as a traffic accident on April 11, 2017, and there is no evidence to prove that C sold the defendant's 785,000,000 won as its heir (the above fact is without permission of the plaintiff to inflict damages equivalent to the above 81,000,000 won by disposing of the plaintiff's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's her heir from 8151,015,01.

2. The Defendant’s assertion regarding the Defendant asserts that C, even though the Plaintiff and salt farm were jointly operated, failed to receive profits from the operation of the farm from the Plaintiff, and provided labor under the direction and supervision of the Plaintiff in the Plaintiff farm without receiving wages from C even if not, C, which C had against the Plaintiff, set off against the Plaintiff’s damage claim by setting the profits claim or wage claim that C had against the Plaintiff as the automatic claim.

The plaintiff and C jointly engaged in the operation of the farm.

It is recognized that the labor has been provided under the direction and supervision of the plaintiff.