logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.04.21 2016고단805
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

No person who loses an official journal shall conceal any false fact through an information and communications network openly with intent to defame another person, thereby impairing the honor of another person.

On July 22, 2015, the Defendant had not played the role of managing 15 apartment buildings for a person who holds a claim amounting to KRW 1.8 billion in the company D in Busan, Jin-gu, Busan, and the fact that the victim C did not play the role of managing 15 apartment buildings for a person who holds a claim amounting to KRW 1.8 billion in the company D, but, using the computer, the Defendant had been invited as an expert at once on the bulletin board of the freedom of association members of the shipping unit DNA.

They have the capacity of membership in other regional housing associations, and will manage 1.8 billion won sewage of the bond holders at our site and 15 apartment houses;

For a long time, PM history and agency will be carried out, and this color will be displayed;

This section could not be able to give up the idea that it is not possible for this section to be qualified for non-Subrogation;

Such false facts as three non-party members and two creditors sewage were posted.

Accordingly, the Defendant, through the information and communication network, destroyed the reputation of the victim by disclosing false information openly.

The crime of failing to impose punishment against the victim: the dismissal of a public prosecution against the victim's intent to punish him/her after the prosecution of Article 70 (3) of the Act on Promotion of Use of Information and Communications Network and Protection of Information: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow