The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable (4 years and six months of imprisonment and eight months of imprisonment).

2. It is recognized that the Defendant’s confessions all of the crimes and reflects the fact that part of the damage was recovered.

However, considering the following factors: (a) the majority of the victims, the amount of damage is large, and the amount of damage has not been recovered; (b) the recidivism was committed despite the history of punishment, such as punishment for the same crime; and (c) the age, sex, family environment, the circumstances and result of the instant crime; and (d) the various conditions of sentencing as shown in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the circumstances and the subsequent circumstances, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition (the court below's 8th six acts of the judgment below shall be corrected to the defendant's 'T'