The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (three years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is recognized as favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case as well as the fact that there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine. However, the crime of this case is committed by transmitting another person's photograph to the victim that the defendant had known through the crypting process, and by taking the processed person and the case into custody and making a false statement, etc., it is very poor that the crime of this case was committed by acquiring money actively planned over five years, and the nature of the crime of this case is very poor, and the damage was not recovered at all from the name of 287 million won, and no particular measure was taken to recover damage was taken, and the victim was threatened with the victim's contact, and there is no good condition after the crime. In full view of various circumstances that form the sentencing conditions of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, etc., the defendant and his defense counsel's allegation of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.