A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle of 2017 Highest 4339, the Defendant is a person who is in charge of driving a vehicle of 30-2

On March 19, 2017, the Defendant driven a vehicle under the influence of alcohol by the Defendant, such as following the police box belonging to the police station located in the Southernnam-gu Police Station D, who called the scene after receiving a report from 112 to the effect that “the driver of the Chump vehicle is suspected to drive a drinking” on the roads front of the Chump 383, Young-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, the Defendant driven a vehicle under the influence of alcohol by the Defendant, such as smelling alcohol and scaring red on the face.

Due to considerable reasons to determine the person, the person is required to take a drinking test.

Defendant E received a request for the first alcohol alcohol measurement from the above policeman E, around 01:17 on the same day, and received a second alcohol measurement on the same day from around 01:37 on the same day, and received a request for the second alcohol measurement on around 01:47 on the same day, but refused a police officer’s request for the measurement of alcohol alcohol without any reason.

2. "2017 Highest 4,389".

A. The Defendant is a person who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter referred to as “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) and violates the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes”).

On April 16, 2017, the Defendant was driving ahead of the F apartment 210-dong in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which was located in the middle distance room in the right line high school, in the direction of one-lane between the two-lane two-lanes.

At the time, the motor vehicle driver is at night and at the same time a stop line is a three-distance intersection, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering system and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, who neglected this and was waiting to turn to the left at the front of the driver's G(66) due to negligence, was shocked with the back part of the first driver's car of the victim G(66) which was waiting to turn to the right at the front.

The defendant is the first passenger car due to the above occupational negligence.