1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 20,642,748; and (b) KRW 13,761,832 to Plaintiff B; and (c) each of the said money, from September 18, 2015 to September 2016.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On February 17, 2015, C is a city bus belonging to a new passenger transport company (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around February 22:24, 2015.

) A driver driving a vehicle and driving a three-laned D in front of the Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, by directly turning the three-laned D into the Chuncheon doctor’s distance room from the north-si. At that time, the network E (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) which is written as the roadway at the end of the roadway of the sidewalk at that time.

2) The deceased caused the death of the deceased on the right side of the bus (hereinafter “instant accident”) due to the damage to the two parts of the bus.

2) The Plaintiff A is the deceased’s wife, and the Plaintiff B is the deceased’s wife, and the Defendant is the mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, 8, Eul evidence 1 through 3 (including branch numbers, if any); hereinafter the same shall apply)

(2) The grounds of appeal No. 1

B. According to the above facts of recognition, since the deceased died due to the accident of this case, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs, who are the deceased and their bereaved family members due to the accident of this case, unless there exist special reasons pursuant to Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act.

In this regard, the defendant argued that the defendant should be exempted from liability because he had no negligence on the part of the bus driver C, because he left the bus at the speed of 34 km at the speed of 60 km/h of the bus, and the deceased's front side of the bus, and the bus driver C was in conflict with the part on the right side of the bus at the time when the deceased passed. However, the bus driver C viewed that he driven the vehicle of the defendant at the police, while driving the vehicle at the police, and driving the vehicle with the deceased at the later distance of 20 to 30 meters from the delivery where the deceased was on the part of the deceased.