logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.05.12 2016고단3940
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 31, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for obstruction of business by the Changwon District Court on the part of August 31, 2016. The judgment became final and conclusive on September 8, 2016.

"2016 Highest 3940"

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On August 30, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime, around 18:20 on August 30, 2015, breath on the main points of “E” operated by the victim D in Busan Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan Government C, and dump the cattle into the coolant with the mind without permission.

Although the victim, who had been suffering from the Defendant, was "Is a large amount of drinking alcohol", the Defendant continued to interfere with the victim's main business due to force to avoid the disturbance of drinking alcohol for about 30 minutes.

B. On November 4, 2015, the Defendant, on November 4, 2015, was under the influence of alcohol in a “H” restaurant operated by the victim G located in Busan Sho-gu, Busan around November 19:30, 2015.

Don't dn't dn't dn't dn't fn't.

Accordingly, from the defect of “the victim has been dwarfed,” the Defendant removed the money from the defect of “the Chewing year,” and “the head of the Si/Gun/Gu.”

In the end, the victim had a desire to keep the victim “Bara” and failed to restrain it, but the victim’s desire to keep the victim “bathly”, and caused the victim’s threat of avoiding the disturbance for about one hour, thereby hindering the victim’s main store business.

(c)

On November 25, 2015, the Defendant, at around 21:00 on November 25, 2015, went under the influence of alcohol in the “K” restaurant operated by the injured party J in Busan, Busan, and began to put the flag, jun, etc. on the restaurant floor.

Therefore, even though the victim made several remarks, the Defendant continued to leave the restaurant floor to the cafeteria, and the Defendant is called “a swaying house,” and the Defendant is called “a swaying house”.

arrow