Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with labor for two years and six months) of the original judgment is too unreasonable.

2. The court below's final sentencing guidelines are as follows: (a) the defendant had a history of being sentenced to punishment several times for the larceny crime; (b) the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of himself/herself during the repeated crime period; (c) the victim is a majority; and (d) the victims have not recovered from damage even though the amount of damage is considerable; (d) the habitual night intrusion larceny of this case committed the crime of this case into the house where the victims are self-employed; (b) the types of crime are excessive and dangerous; (c) the scope of punishment for the crime of this case according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court's sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Committee; (d) the range of punishment punishment for the crime of this case; (e) the fraud crime of this case; (e) the crime of this case; (e) the range of punishment punishment for the special person; (e) the decision of recommended area; (g) the scope of punishment punishment for the recommendation (within six months to six months); (e) the punishment guidelines for punishment for the crime of larceny of this case; (v) the crime of habitual theft of this case;

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.