A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on January 23, 2014 (the issuance of a summary order of a fine of KRW 1.5 million at the Suwon Friwon on April 2, 2014), driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on June 12, 2014 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 5 million at the Suwon Friwon Friwon on August 27, 2014), and violating Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions.

On February 27, 2018, the Defendant driven a car with Chovasty over about 500 meters from the 50-lane 15, Sinsan-ro, Cheongsi-ro, Cheongsi-ro, Cheongsi-ro, 211, to the front road of the water-oriented arboretum located in 211 while under the influence of alcohol content 0.132% of alcohol among blood transfusions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Records of judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, investigation report (verification of the same kind of force) and other relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant, who had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had to have had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had

However, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, that there is no record that the defendant has been punished for the suspension of execution or more until now, and that there is other age, sex, environment and crime of the defendant.