1. It is confirmed that the Plaintiff’s obligation to the Defendant in KRW 412,388,340 was discharged.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Description of Claim

The amount of the Defendant’s debt owed to the Plaintiff under the Daegu District Court Decision 2007Gadan24040 (Law No. 850, Jan. 25, 2008; Mar. 18, 2008) and the Panel Division of Daegu District Court Decision 2009Gau109581 (Law No. 2010, Jun. 8, 2010; Supreme Court Decision 25, Jun. 25, 2010), among the obligations owed by the Defendant against the Defendant, is as follows:

B 5,07,840 209,171,450 0 264,179,179, 290 on October 17, 2013, 17 C 4,738,369 16,431,200,230 21,180,030 21,180,030 21,2180,030 421,206,484 105,440,596381,596381,940,27,029,000 264,179, 179, 264, 290, 290, 264, 2610, 290, 290, 200, 200, 238,340, and 219, 2013.

In the above bankruptcy and exemption case, the above bankruptcy liability of the plaintiff against the defendant was not included in the list of creditors.

However, the plaintiff did not enter the obligation against the defendant in the list of creditors in bad faith.

In accordance with the main sentence of Article 566 of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act, the above bankruptcy debt against the defendant, which the plaintiff omitted in the list of creditors, was exempted by the above immunity decision.

Articles 208(3)1 and 257(1) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts (a judgment without a presentation of a written reply)