1. According to the Plaintiff’s amendment of the purport of the claim in the trial, the judgment of the first instance is modified as follows.

The plaintiff.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged in full view of the following facts: Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, 10, 12, 13 through 17, 19, 23, 24, 25, 27, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (in the case of additional numbers, including the whole number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and witness F of the court of first instance, and the whole purport of the pleadings as a whole.

The Plaintiff’s new construction of the instant plant in Ansan-si operated meat factories, and operated businesses, such as processing and consignment sales of pigs and cattle products. Prior to division, an advanced stock company (registration number: 1341-000735) was divided into one company pursuant to Article 530-2 of the Commercial Act on January 4, 2011, and the name of the surviving divided company was changed from the existing “Advance Stock Company” to the “Advance Stock Company” (registration number: 1341-00735), and the name of the newly incorporated benefit company was determined as the “Advance Stock Company” (registration number: 13411 - 04664) as the existing trade name of the company prior to division. An advanced stock company, which is a newly incorporated benefit company, should be deemed to be the one of the parties to the instant lawsuit, and an advanced stock company, which remains in existence after the division, as the one of the parties to the instant lawsuit (hereinafter “EM 201”).