1. Regarding the principal claim of the judgment of the first instance, including the selective claim of the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) added by this Court.

1. The reasons why this Court uses this part of the basic facts are as stated in Section 1. of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The judgment of the court of first instance on the principal lawsuit dismissed the defendant's counterclaim, and the defendant did not file an appeal. Accordingly, the subject of the judgment of this court is limited to the part on the principal lawsuit.

A. The gist of the plaintiff's assertion 1) The defendant notified the plaintiff that "the monthly sales of the store of this case are more than 50 million won and net monthly sales are more than 16 million won, and the plaintiff partially paid education expenses in connection with the franchise business, and the defendant did not establish a new franchise store after transferring the store of this case to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff's "head office" will not guarantee the plaintiff's right to use the name," and entered into each contract of this case with the defendant with trust. However, in fact, the monthly sales and net income of the store of this case fall short of the above amount, and the defendant did not grant education authority to the plaintiff or did not pay education expenses. The plaintiff discontinued the plaintiff's use of the name "G (main office) store of this case" in the store of this case without justifiable grounds, and the plaintiff concluded each contract of this case with the defendant, which belongs to the defendant's deception, and the defendant violated the obligation to provide information of this case, and thus, the contract of this case was revoked or cancelled as a copy of the complaint of this case.