1. The appeal by the defendant (appointed party) is dismissed;

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the defendant (appointed party).

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 2016, the selector requested the Plaintiff, who operates the real estate brokerage office, to mediate the commercial lease for the reading room business, under the trade name of the “D Licensed Real Estate Agent Office”.

B. On March 18, 2016, the Plaintiff introduced the entire 4,5 stories among the land buildings in Yeongdeungpo-gu E (hereinafter “instant real estate”). On the same day, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement between the Plaintiff F and the Appointor for KRW 80,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 2,900,000, and the lease period of April 30, 2016 (hereinafter “the instant primary lease agreement”).

C. Article 8 of the first lease agreement of this case states, “The brokerage remuneration shall be paid by both parties to the contract at the same time as this contract is concluded, and the brokerage remuneration shall be paid even after this contract is invalidated, cancelled, or terminated without the intention or negligence of the practicing licensed real estate agent.” In the middle real estate agent column, the Plaintiff signed and sealed his name.

선정자는 2016. 5. 1. 이 사건 임대차계약을 포기하기로 하고 자신의 제수(弟嫂)인 피고가 원고를 통하여 F과 사이에 위 나항과 같은 내용으로 임대차계약(이하 ‘이 사건 2차 임대차계약)을 체결하였다. 마. 이 사건 1, 2차 임대차계약서에 첨부된 중개대상물 확인설명서의 ‘중개보수 등에 관한 사항'에는 이 사건 매매계약의 중개보수료가 각 3,330,000원으로 기재되어 있고, 선정자와 피고는 위 확인설명서에 각 서명날인하였다.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 4, 5, 9, 10, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff asserted by the parties against the Defendant and the appointed parties seeking payment of KRW 3,300,000 as agreed upon at the time of each of the instant and each of the instant lease agreements.

On the other hand, the defendant and the designated parties were revoked the first lease contract of this case, and the second lease contract of this case was the first lease contract of this case.