All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is not the case of Busan District Court Decision 2015Na28666 decided by the Defendants, but the case of the order of the building ordered by Busan District Court Decision 2015Na666, which is not the case of a direct performance of the rights stated in the will of this case, but the case of a separate subject matter of lawsuit.

In addition, the period when the Defendants’ performance of their duties is illegal should be seen as after the argument that contests the validity of the deed of fairness of the will of this case and became a key issue. Since the complainant resigned from the court below's first hearing date when the complainant asserted the defect of the deed of fairness of the will of this case, the Defendants resigned from the court below's office as to the above case.

shall not be deemed to exist.

However, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The court below rejected the Defendants’ assertion in detail under the title “the determination of the Defendants’ assertion” in the judgment of the court below on the grounds for appeal of this case. In the judgment of the court below, the first instance court of Busan District Court 2015Na 6866 decided that the Defendants accepted the Defendants’ assertion on the validity of the fair will of this case in the judgment of the complainant as to the claim on the invalidation of the fair will of this case, in addition to the Defendants who accepted the lawsuit of this case by the court below after accepting the case as a notary public, and prepared and submitted the preparation document and presented it on the date of pleadings, with the knowledge that the Defendant law firm's acceptance of the case is the issue of the validity of the fair will of this case as a notary public. In addition, in addition to the above, the court below's judgment of the first instance court of the case that the Defendants accepted by the Defendants is a law firm, as stipulated in Article 51 of the Defense Counsel.