1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 2, 1994, the Plaintiff was receiving medical treatment by being diagnosed as a semi-sculatory assistant principal, a new sculatory sculmat, after the left floor of the upper floor, by falling down at the construction site.

B. The Plaintiff received medical treatment from August 1995 to July 2012 at the Defendant C Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

On November 16, 2009, the result of the RoI shooting against the plaintiff 4,5 times in the MDR on November 16, 2009 showed that there were 4,00 bulging L4-5 Ebulging L4-5 Ebulll, 11,12 times in the plelare Sbullle 11,12 times in the Madu Rolar Rolar Rolar 11-12.

C. On November 11, 2014, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Jeonnam University Hospital with the chronronic typhrosis Nos. 11,12, and was diagnosed by the chronological typosis at the D Hospital on October 4, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4, and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. On September 1, 2009 or September 28, 2009, when the plaintiff was receiving medical treatment at the defendant hospital, the plaintiff stated in the preparatory document dated November 27, 2009 that the date when the plaintiff first received chest injection was September 28, 2009, but it is not clear which date among them.

On November 16, 2009, the result of the MRI examination showed that the MRI was influent 11,12 pinites and 4,5 diskss were influence.

As above, in the Defendant hospital, the injection was fluorted outside the boom, and the injection was fluorted with the bones of the fluorial body and caused a disc expansion. The injection was erroneous on the inner side of the bluorial body, thereby causing a chemical reaction with disc gluor, and the fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluor.

Since the plaintiff suffered from hard-floud and yellow tylostosiss caused by the scarbing of the defendant hospital up to now, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages amounting to 500,000,000.