logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.08.13 2018고단2589
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around February 2013, the Defendant stated to the effect that “Around February 2018, the Defendant borrowed the accounts operating expenses, etc. as it is possible to repay the borrowed money from the victim B at an irregular place (hereinafter referred to as “the land exists in the sea and is in operation of the world”) at the time of the preceding week.”

However, the suspect did not have any intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed the money from the victim because the suspect did not make a certain profit and lives with money received from his own consciousness.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 10 million from the victim as the borrowed money on February 18, 2013, from that time until July 2017, as well as from that time, paid KRW 71 million in total on seven occasions, such as the list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

【A fact pending in the court of first instance 2019 order 17】 The Defendant is a person who was not detained in a crime of fraud at the Jeonju District Court on December 26, 2018 and is currently pending in the court of first instance.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On July 20, 2017, the Defendant against the victim C told the victim C to organize an order of 10 million won and 26 members of the fraternity at an influent place. The Defendant concluded that the victim C would pay the fraternity by purchasing two units of accounts (11 and 16), and that the Defendant would pay 500,000 won of the monthly interest to be paid to the victim, and that the remainder would be paid by joining the fraternity and paying the fraternity.

However, in fact, the Defendant attempted to “refiscing” the term “refiscing” in which he/she performs his/her obligation with the deposit money received as the victim, and even if he/she wishes to receive the deposit money from the victim, he/she did not have any intent or ability to operate the deposit money even if he/she received the deposit money from the victim.

As above, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is therefore bound by the victim as a deposit money from the victim.

arrow