Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving the B-learning passenger car.

On July 25, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 17:38 on July 25, 2016, while driving the right line C in Suwon-si, and the back road in the direction of water source from the bank of a long apartment.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to safely drive a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle by driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded before the victim D (74 tax) who was passing ahead of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the victim’s right side was set back with the front right side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Defendant 1 suffered injury to the right-hand 2, 3, and 4 to the right-hand pelvis, which requires approximately six weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the Order to Attend Education [the scope of recommended punishment] There is no person [the person who is subject to special sentencing] in the basic area of the first type of traffic accident (for April to one year] [the decision of sentence] [the person who is subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentence] the defendant reflects the defendant, the degree of the victim's injury is not easy, the defendant was covered only by mandatory insurance and did not properly recover from damage (the insurance company and medical expenses of the insurance covered by the victim are agreed upon with the insurance company covered by the victim). The defendant did not have any criminal record except that the defendant was punished once due to the violation of the special law of the teaching party, and the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant'