logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2019.07.04 2019고단467
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be set forth in six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On July 14, 2014, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the port branch of the Daegu District Court on July 14, 2014, and on July 12, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 2,00,000 to ten months for the same crime, etc. at the same court on July 12, 2018, which became final and conclusive on July 20, 201

【Criminal Facts】

1. The defendant is in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury).

On February 14, 2019, at around 17:15, the Defendant driven the said cargo without obtaining a driver's license under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.119%. On February 14, 2019, the Defendant was driving the said cargo as one-lane of the two-lane two-lanes in front of the front door of the North-gu apartment C apartment at the port of one-lane, North-gu, North Korea, into C apartment bank.

In this case, the driver has a duty of care to safely operate by accurately manipulating the front door and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the steering system of the apartment.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was driven by the victim D (the age of 28) who was under a stop in the front bank due to negligence of failing to properly operate the brake system while neglecting his duty of care in the front line while under the influence of alcohol, and the victim E (the age of 54) was on the front line of the freight of the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered salt, tensions, and tensions, respectively, for two weeks at the same time, from the victims by occupational negligence as above.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) were driven by the Defendant without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of approximately 11 km of blood alcohol concentration from the 11km to the above location at the port of loading at the above temporary border.

This is the defendant.

arrow